35 views · Last viewed: 3 days ago · Watch on Youtube
Video Description (from Youtube)
She starts off by using the second reference first which is a little surprising. The second reference is most likely talking about a different Jesus but a scribe interpolated the marginal note of "who was called the Christ." Syntactically that is how it reads and scribal interpolation in this fashion was very common. Also the context of the passage doesn't lend itself to think that they were talking about "the Christ."
Then she starts in on the Testamonium Flavianum. She follows the more secular and redacted view of the passage but the problem is that all references to that stem from Eusebias. So Eusebias is the first to mention this passage even existing even though plenty of Church fathers prior to this had more than enough reason to cite it. Eusebias is also very well known for his forgeries and changing of documents. He would change anything to make his case stronger.
There has been a lot of analysis done on the passage and all signs point to Josephus NOT writing the passage.
Subscribe to this channel: https://goo.gl/2oZaqY
Become a Patron: http://goo.gl/VRVjxK
Original Video: http://bit.ly/ProvingJesusExistedWithoutBible
Intro by "Gonna Go For it": https://goo.gl/1Ay1Q3
FOLLOW me on Twitter: https://goo.gl/BbxhWL
LIKE on Facebook: https://goo.gl/3xEibn
FOLLOW on Instagram: https://goo.gl/jakMWx
FOLLOW on Twitch: https://goo.gl/FhVHrG
All videos are for educational purposes only. All videos remain hosted on Youtube and are shared on this page. The video title is derived from: (1) the original Youtube video title, (2) the video content, (3) dialogue and speech in the video, and (4) the overall content. The video title does not represent the views of any individual, speaker, organisation or business. Video titles are edited and optimized for SEO, keyword density, clarity of information and internal/external search purposes.
If you spot any mistake, omission or to report abuse, kindly Contact Us with details.
50:42
26
1501545600
1756976722
Who was Flavius Josephus? - Henry Abramson
003042
1
5:00
92
1504459830
1756884024
Josephus' Writings (37-100 AD) on Jesus Christ were a Christian forgery? - Chris Forbes
000300
2
1:01:45
30
1513163675
1756975147
Josephus wrote of the Egyptian Jesus - Lena Einhorn
003705
3
22:41
13
1513122119
1756871065
Jesus was unknown outside of the Gospels. We need Josephus - Lena Einhorn
001361
4
26:36
42
1536046391
1756974782
Greek: Iesous is not a translation of Hebrew: Yeshua, claimed Josephus, Eusebius, Clement & Cyril. We simply do NOT know Jesus' real name - Mansur Ahmad vs Christian
001596
5
14:28
35
1542660011
1756822446
Josephus (37-100 AD) proves Jesus existed? - Brittany Valadez (Godless Engineer)
000868
6
12:24
70
1554229253
1756865656
Was Mark's Gospel copied from Josephus 'War of the Jews' after 75 AD? - Fishers Evidence
000744
7
6:19
27
1556568071
1756853327
Quick introduction to Flavius Josephus
000379
8
22:21
40
1556568073
1756986546
Josephus On Jesus | Milwaukee Atheists
001341
9
20:28
36
1562319590
1756866122
Josephus (37-100 AD): Aramaic was language of Jews in Roman Judea
001228
10
8:30
22
1570024708
1756304072
Josephus' "Antiquities of Jews" from 94 AD (Book 18, Ch. 3,3) is Unreliable Evidence for Jesus' existence - TruthSurge
000510
11
11:01
42
1570024722
1756958370
Secular Christian history is Unreliable. Josephus, Pliny, Tacitus, Seutonius, Thallus, Lucian & Celsus' prove nothing! - TruthSurge
000661
12
26:39
35
1571838237
1756564104
The Talmud (400 AD), Mara Bar-Serapion (73), Celsus (175) & Josephus (37-100) do NOT prove an Historical Jesus ever Existed in 33 AD - Godless Engineer
001599
13
