408 views
·
Last viewed: 16 hrs ago
Uploaded: 02 Oct 2018 (8 years ago) · Shared: 19 Nov 2018
using the second reference first which is a little surprising. The second reference is most likely talking about a different Jesus but a scribe interpolated the marginal note of 'who was called the Christ.' Syntactically that is how it reads and scribal interpolation in this fashion was very common. Also the context of the passage doesn't lend itself to think that they were talking about 'the Christ.'
Then she starts in on the Testamonium Flavianum. She follows the more secular and redacted view of the passage but the problem is that all references to that stem from Eusebias. So Eusebias is the first to mention this passage even existing even though plenty of Church fathers prior to this had more than enough reason to cite it. Eusebias is also very well known for his forgeries and changing of documents. He would change anything to make his case stronger.
There has been a lot of analysis done on the passage and all signs point to Josephus NOT writing the passage.
Subscribe to this channel: https://goo.gl/2oZaqY
Become a Patron: http://goo.gl/VRVjxK
Original Video: http://bit.ly/ProvingJesusExistedWithoutBible
Intro by 'Gonna Go For it': https://goo.gl/1Ay1Q3
FOLLOW me on Twitter: https://goo.gl/BbxhWL
LIKE on Facebook: https://goo.gl/3xEibn
FOLLOW on Instagram: https://goo.gl/jakMWx
FOLLOW on Twitch: https://goo.gl/FhVHrG
Uploaded: 02 Oct 2018 (8 years ago) · Shared: 19 Nov 2018
Video Description (from Youtube)
What's Up Heathens! Today Brittany Valadez is going to show us how Josephus proves Jesus' Historicity! Spoiler: He doesn't but she's a good example of how bad the apologetics is. She starts off byusing the second reference first which is a little surprising. The second reference is most likely talking about a different Jesus but a scribe interpolated the marginal note of 'who was called the Christ.' Syntactically that is how it reads and scribal interpolation in this fashion was very common. Also the context of the passage doesn't lend itself to think that they were talking about 'the Christ.'
Then she starts in on the Testamonium Flavianum. She follows the more secular and redacted view of the passage but the problem is that all references to that stem from Eusebias. So Eusebias is the first to mention this passage even existing even though plenty of Church fathers prior to this had more than enough reason to cite it. Eusebias is also very well known for his forgeries and changing of documents. He would change anything to make his case stronger.
There has been a lot of analysis done on the passage and all signs point to Josephus NOT writing the passage.
Subscribe to this channel: https://goo.gl/2oZaqY
Become a Patron: http://goo.gl/VRVjxK
Original Video: http://bit.ly/ProvingJesusExistedWithoutBible
Intro by 'Gonna Go For it': https://goo.gl/1Ay1Q3
FOLLOW me on Twitter: https://goo.gl/BbxhWL
LIKE on Facebook: https://goo.gl/3xEibn
FOLLOW on Instagram: https://goo.gl/jakMWx
FOLLOW on Twitch: https://goo.gl/FhVHrG
Search Results on 'Josephus (37-100 AD) proves Jesus existed? - Brittany Valadez (Godless Engineer)'
SCROLL TO :TOPICS | 2NEWS | 0ARTICLES | 0FAQ | 0VIDEO | 26LINKS | 0TOPICS #GODLESS ENGINEER JOSEPHUS
Topics include Godless Engineer, Josephus (2)
Who are Godless Engineer?
|
Who was Josephus?
Titus Flavius Josephus (37-100 AD), known as 'Josephus' was a first-century Romano-Jewish scholar. He was a historian and hagiographer, who was born in Jerusalem, then part of Roman Judea, to a father of priestly descent and a mother who claimed royal ancestry.
<br><br>
He initially fought against
the Romans during the First Jewish-Roman War as head of Jewish forces in Galilee, until surrendering in 67 CE to Roman forces led by Vespasian after the six-week siege of Jotapata. Josephus claimed the Jewish Messianic prophecies that initiated the First Roman-Jewish War made reference to Vespasian becoming Emperor of Rome. In response Vespasian decided to keep Josephus as a slave and presumably interpreter. <br><br> After Vespasian became Emperor in 69 CE, he granted Josephus his freedom, at which time Josephus assumed the emperor's family name of Flavius. Flavius Josephus fully defected to the Roman side and was granted Roman citizenship. He became an advisor and friend of Vespasian's son Titus, serving as his translator when Titus led the Siege of Jerusalem. |
Youtube Videos on Godless Engineer, Josephus (26)
Who was Flavius 
Jesus was unknown outside of the Gospels. We need 
Greek: Iesous is not a translation of Hebrew: Yeshua, claimed 
Mark is the most reliable Gospel. Matthew, Luke and John are later 'corrections' of Mark - 
I am a Jesus Mythicist due to: Philo of Alexandria; Prophecies; and Bible Parallels - 
Jesus' Resurrection: Deny the Historical Evidence and trust Apostle Paul - Tony Costa (
Jesus' Resurrection: Where is the Evidence? - Gene Kim (
Jesus' Birth Narrative contradictions in the Bible - 
Tacitus (56-120 AD) proves Jesus existed? - Brittany Valadez (
Homosexuality, Sodom-Gomorrah and Lot in the Bible | 
Sumerian goddess, Inanna similarities with Jesus - 
In 1807, 'The Slave Bible' published by Christian Slave masters was used to control obedient Black Slaves - 
Pliny the Elder (23-79 AD) never wrote of Jesus, Christianity, or any Biblical events - 
Was Mark's Gospel copied from 
Quick introduction to Flavius 
Christianity is Progressing. Is Homosexuality still wrong? - Ductin (
Secular Christian history is Unreliable. 
Tacitus (56-120 AD), Suetonius (69-126), Pliny (61-113), Lucian (120-192) & Thallus do NOT prove an Historical Jesus ever Existed in 33 AD - 
The Talmud (400 AD), Mara Bar-Serapion (73), Celsus (175) & 
5 Reasons why Jesus' Good Friday is wrong -
DISCLAIMER
All videos are shared for educational and information purposes only. All videos are hosted and viewable on Youtube servers. Video titles are generated using the original video title; overall content theme including actual dialogue and speech (Transcript); and A.I-based recommendations with a focus on SEO, keyword density, and internal search functions. The video title does not represent the views held by the Youtube video uploader, or any individual, organisation or business.
If you spot any mistake, omission or give feedback, kindly contact us with details
All videos are shared for educational and information purposes only. All videos are hosted and viewable on Youtube servers. Video titles are generated using the original video title; overall content theme including actual dialogue and speech (Transcript); and A.I-based recommendations with a focus on SEO, keyword density, and internal search functions. The video title does not represent the views held by the Youtube video uploader, or any individual, organisation or business.
If you spot any mistake, omission or give feedback, kindly contact us with details
