10
Jesus Existed, but is different from Gospel Jesus
Mythicism
Jesus did exist but was very different from the gospel Jesus.[38] (This is very close to the ahistorical category above)
"I don’t think you can ‘prove’ either that a historical Jesus existed or that he didn’t. What you can do.. is to construe the same old evidence in a new way that makes more natural, less contrived, sense."
Robert Price (2018)."Foreword" ap. Price, R. G. Deciphering the Gospels: Proves Jesus Never Existed (2nd revised ed.). Lulu Publishing Services. p. ix. ISBN 978-1-4834-8782-3.
"For all the evidence anyone has ever adduced from the Epistles (once we exclude those known to be forged): it is ambiguous as to whether an earthly or celestial Jesus is being referred to. The Gospels I found wholly symbolically fictional and not even interested in actual history. And the Jesus in them I found to be so very like other mythical persons of the period. And then I found that no other evidence can be shown to be independent of the Gospels. At the very least, putting all of that together should make agnosticism about the historicity of Jesus a credible conclusion."
Carrier, Richard (2015)."Foreword" ap. Lataster, Raphael. Jesus Did Not Exist: A Debate Among Atheists. pp. xi-xii. ISBN 1514814420.
"There is a 1:3 (~33%) chance that Jesus existed."
Carrier (1 July 2019). "Spencer Alexander McDaniel on the Historicity of Jesus". Richard Carrier Blogs. "[On the Historicity of Jesus, published in 2014] arguing that Jesus’s historicity has odds of at best 1 in 3 is also the first to pass peer review in the century long history of arguing such a thesis (and indeed by a respected biblical studies press then run by faculty on the campus of the University of Sheffield)."
One of the leading mythicism scholars is Richard Carrier. Other leading mythicism scholars include Robert M. Price, Thomas L. Brodie, etc.