The oldest Bible manuscripts end Mark's Gospel at 16:8. What do Bible scholars say on the extra 12 verses, the 'Longer Ending'?
Two of the oldest, most respected Bible manuscripts, Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus end the Gospel of Mark at 16:8. Yet, the Bible you have ends Mark's Gospel at 16:20.
Today, the majority of Bible scholars agree 12 'longer ending' verses in Mark's Gospel were added by later scribes. A few reasons for this corruption, are given below:
It is almost universally agreed that verses 9-20 were added centuries after the gospel was written
Dr. Ralph Earle (1970)
Verses 9-20 are "lacking in many of the oldest and most reliable manuscripts"
Dr. Norman L. Geisler and Thomas A. Howe (2008). The Big Book of Bible Difficulties (page 377). Baker Books
"In many ancient Greek manuscripts," Mark's Gospel ends at 16:8
Dr. Larry O. Richards
(3)
"Mark 16:9-20 does not appear in many early manuscripts"
Jim Levitt, whose M. Div. is from Trinity Divinity School
(3)
Mark 16:9-20 is omitted "in very many Greek manuscripts of the Gospel"
Wilfrid J. Harrington (4)
"According to the almost unanimous testimony of the oldest Greek manuscripts," Mark ends at 16:8
Dr. Donald Juel
(5)
These 12 verses "are found in no early manuscript,"
Dr. Ernest Findlay Scott (6)
"All major manuscripts end this Gospel at 16:8"
David Ewert (6)
Mark 16:9-20 "is contained only in later manuscripts."
Dr. Eugene Peterson (7)
Codex Alexandrinus does not contain Mark 16:9-20
Dr. Ron Rhodes (1997) The Complete Book of Bible Answers (8)
Codex D's text of Mark ends at 16:8
G. W. Trompf. New Testament Studies scholarly journal (9)
"It's also a fact that these verses, as I've said a couple of times, really don't have any substantiation until you get to medieval times. Until you get to about 800-900 AD you can't find a manuscript that contains these verses of Scripture."
Bob McCartney (10)
Codex W "contains a different ending entirely"
Dr. Robert Grant (11)
"A good many of the manuscripts" with Mark 16:9-20 "have marks in the margin (asterisks or obeli) to indicate that the passage is regarded as of doubtful authenticity."
Dr. N. T. Wright (12)
"A number of the manuscripts have asterisks or other markings by the text indicating that the copyists thought the longer ending was spurious"
Robert Stein (13)
"Many of the ancient manuscripts" contain "scribal notes or markings" to indicate that "the ending is regarded as a spurious addition."
James Edwards (13)
"Many of the older manuscripts have asterisks and obeli marking off the Long or Short Endings as spurious or at least doubtful," and, "Later copies contain vv. 9-20, but they are marked off with asterisks or obelisks, warning readers and copyists that these twelve verses are doubtful."
Dr. Craig Evans
(14)
There verses "were added at least two centuries after Mark first began to circulate" which means, if the Gospel of Mark’s production-date is placed in the mid-60's, that Mark 16:9-20 was attached some time after 260 AD.
Dr. Craig Evans
(15)
"The earliest and best manuscripts end with Mark 16:8, and the rest hopelessly disagree concerning what follows."
Robert H. Gundry (16)
"In some manuscripts,the Shorter Ending is all that follows Mark 16:8"
C. F. D. Moule (17)
According to Clement and Origen (two important writers in the early church), Mark's text ends at 16:8
Dr. Philip Wesley Comfort (20)
"Clement of Alexandria, Origen, and Ammonius show no knowledge of the existence of these verses."
Dr. Bruce Metzger (21)
The text of Mark ends at 16:8 in "about 100 Armenian manuscripts, and the two oldest Georgian manuscripts (written A.D. 897 and A.D. 913)."
Dr. Bruce Metzger. A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament (29)
"A number of manuscripts of the Ethiopic version" do not contain Mark 16:9-20
Dr. Metzger. The Text of the New Testament, 4th Edition (page 226) (30)
"A number of manuscripts of the Ethiopic version" do not contain Mark 16:9-20
Dr. Bart Ehrman. The Text of the New Testament, 4th Edition (page 226) (30)
"Clement of Alexandria, Origen, and Ammonius show no knowledge of the existence of these verses."
Dr. Bart Ehrman (21)
The ending at 16:8 is witnessed to by Clement of Alexandria and Origen
Robert Stein (22)
"The 2nd century Church Father Cyril of Alexandria" omitted these verses
Dr. J. Harold Greenlee (23)
Eusebius and Jerome (two important writers in the early church) "say that the passage was unknown in all copies of Mark to which they had access."
Dr. Ralph P. Martin (24)
Mark 16:9-20 was lacking "from all Greek manuscripts known to Eusebius and Jerome"
Dr. W. R. Telford (25)
"Eusebius and Jerome both tell us these verses were absent from all Greek copies known to them."
Dr. Ben Witherington III (26)
Early commentaries confirm that Mark ends at 16:8, including a commentary "written by Clement of Alexandria (died about AD 101)."
Stephen M. Miller (2007) The Complete Guide to the Bible (27)
"Not only do some of the most ancient authorities lack these verses (as NRSV says) – they all do."
Dr. Tim Geddert (28)
"A number of manuscripts of the Ethiopic version" do not contain Mark 16:9-20. (or similar)
Matt Slick. Online Apologist (31)
Important Ethiopic copies omit Mark 16:9-20
Dr. Eugene Nida (32)
"These verses are absent from the Old Latin manuscripts"
Dr. Ron Rhodes (33)
The Old Latin version omits Mark 16:9-20
Dr. James Edwards (33)
Mark 16:9-20 is not in "some manuscripts of the Sahadic Coptic version, manuscripts of the Armenian translation, and some versions of the Georgian translation."
James White, Author (34)
CREDIT
Authentic: The Case for Mark 16:9-20 by James Snapp
https://www.academia.edu/12545835/Authentic_The_Case_for_Mark_16_9-20
Share Article if you found it useful
688 views · 2 days ago |
Author: Guest
•
Updated: 04 Nov 2019 |
ALL ARTICLES ARE INTENDED FOR GENERAL EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL INFORMATION IS BELIEVED TO BE CORRECT, ACCURATE AND TRUTHFUL. YOU ARE ADVISED TO DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH. ARTICLES ARE LIVE DOCUMENTS AND MAY BE UPDATED WITH NEW CONTENT AT ANY TIME. WHERE AVAILABLE, SOURCES AND REFERENCES ARE CREDITED. IF YOU SPOT ANY ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR GIVE FEEDBACK KINDLY
CONTACT US WITH DETAILS
196-bible-mark-16-9-20-scholars
12 Videos with 'Mark+16:9-20'
3:07
6187 views · 1 hr ago |
7 years ago
1 of 12
6187
1501545600
1714942062
Should Mark 16:9-20 be in the Bible? - Daniel Wallace and Darrell Bock - Ankerberg Show
000187
1
5:09
4296 views · 1 hr ago |
7 years ago
2 of 12
4296
1501545600
1714942696
Mark 16:9-20 is not Authentic - Daniel Wallace - Ehrman Project
000309
2
7:12
3577 views · 25 mins ago |
7 years ago
3 of 12
3577
1501545600
1714945589
I would not preach Mark 16:9-20 - James White
000432
3
5:09
3920 views · 9 mins ago |
7 years ago
4 of 12
3920
1501545600
1714946550
Mark 16:9-20 is fake - Bart Ehrman
000309
4
5:28
3101 views · 54 mins ago |
7 years ago
5 of 12
3101
1501545600
1714943802
Is the ending of Mark 16:9-20 original? - Shabir Ally
000328
5
17:47
6175 views · 2 hrs ago |
7 years ago
6 of 12
6175
1501545600
1714941304
Jesus' Resurrection: Mark 16:9-20 was quoted by Early Church Fathers: Papias, Justin Martyr, Irenaeous, Hippolytus, Vincentius, Augustine - Chuck Missler
001067
6
44:45
6160 views · 1 hr ago |
7 years ago
7 of 12
6160
1501545600
1714942769
Mark 16:9-20 is missing in the Earliest Bible Manuscripts: Codex Sinaiticus (350 AD) and Codex Vaticanus (300 AD)
002685
7
5:01
5981 views · 59 mins ago |
7 years ago
8 of 12
5981
1501545600
1714943519
Jesus' Resurrection: Mark 16:9-20 was added into the Bible - Ali Ataie vs David Wood
000301
8
2:32
5024 views · 58 mins ago |
6 years ago
9 of 12
5024
1529106357
1714943585
In Mark 16:9-20, the earliest manuscripts do not have these 11 extra verses. Scribes added them later - Daniel Wallace
000152
9
2:56
6035 views · 59 mins ago |
6 years ago
10 of 12
6035
1529023006
1714943549
In Mark 16:9-20, Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus do not have Mark's long ending - Daniel Wallace
000176
10
3:22
4364 views · 57 mins ago |
6 years ago
11 of 12
4364
1530143004
1714943668
In Mark 16:9-20, Scribes wrote a 'longer ending' to New Testament Bible - Bart Ehrman
000202
11
3:20
2975 views · 20 mins ago |
6 years ago
12 of 12
2975
1531553612
1714945891
On Mark 16:9-20, RSV Bible places the 12 'longer ending' verses in a footnote - Bruce Metzger
000200
12
News on 'Mark 16:9-20'
Results:
0 News Items
Displayed in Date Order (most recent first)