Bible - The Synoptic Problem


The similarities between the Synoptic Gospels have caused the 'Synoptic Problem'. The solution lies in the numerous theories and hypothesis

Matthew, Mark and Luke are commonly called the Synoptic Gospels. The Synoptic Gospels are very similar to each other. In fact, their similarities have led to one of the most debated subjects amongst New Testament Bible scholars - 'The Synoptic Problem' (i.e. who copied who?)

Mark Matthew Luke John
60-80 AD 70-100 AD 93 AD 125 AD

Winged Lion

Winged Man

Winged Ox

Eagle
Synoptic Problem
Synoptic
Synoptic
Synoptic
Not Synoptic
  • Mark's Gospel is almost universally accepted as the first gospel to be written
  • Mark is the shortest and simplest of the three Synoptic gospels
  • Large portions of Mark are found in Matthew and Luke
  • Matthew and Luke share over 200 verses not found in Mark
  • Shared content includes stories, wording, and chronology of events
  • Triple tradition - Text found in all three Synoptic Gospels
  • Double tradition, or "Q" Source - Text found in both Matthew and Luke
  • M tradition - Text found exclusively in Matthew
  • L tradition - Text found exclusively in Luke
John's content, chronology and wording is distinctly different to the Synoptics.
Hebrew Gospel Hypothesis
Hebrew Gospel Hypothesis involves a lost gospel in Hebrew, Aramaic or even Greek as the primary source behind the Synoptic gospels.

* Stein, Synoptic Problem, p.48
** Evidence suggests Matthew and Luke did not copy from each other
Other Hypothesis'
1.   Augustinian Hypothesis
Both Irenaeus and Origen, predecessors of Augustine, also held to the same order of composition. Later advocates of this theory include Hugo Grotius, HG Jameson, Basil Christopher Butler and John Wenham.
2.   Two-Gospel Hypothesis (Griesbach)
This theory is supported by Henry Owen, JJ Griesbach, William R Farmer, and TRW Longstaff et al.
3.   Two-Source Hypothesis
This theory is supported by the majority of New Testament scholars today.
4.   Three-Source Hypothesis
This theory is supported by Heinrich Julius Holtzmann, Eduard Simons, Hans Hinrich Wendt, Edward Y Hincks, Robert Morgenthaler and Robert H. Gundry.
5.   Four-Document Hypothesis
This is a variation of the Two-Source Hypothesis and so is highly favored among Bible scholars today.
6.   Farrer Hypothesis (Mark without Q)
This theory is supported by JH Ropes, AM Farrer, MD Goulder and Mark Goodacre
7.   Hebrew Gospel Hypothesis (or Proto-Gospel)
This theory is based on the proposition that a lost gospel in Hebrew or Aramaic lies behind the Synoptic gospels. (outlined above)

CREDIT
http://www.humanreligions.info/gospels.html
http://www.bowness.demon.co.uk/gosp1.htm
http://megasociety.org/noesis/138/synoptic.html
https://www.tms.edu/m/tmsj13b.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebrew_Gospel_hypothesis


113-bible-synoptic-problem
Author: Guest   •   Updated: 05 Sep 2026   •   21,995 views   |   50 mins ago
DISCLAIMER
All articles are intended for general educational purposes only. All information is believed to be correct, accurate and truthful. You are advised to always do your own research. Articles are live documents and may be updated with new content at any time. Where available, sources and references are credited. If you spot any errors, omissions or to give feedback kindly contact us with details.

SUBSCRIBE

Receive the latest news and updates by email - Subscribe Now!
About  |  Q&A  |  Contact Us    •    Terms  |  Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  Sitemap
Connect:      Facebook  |    Twitter  |    Youtube
MuslimProphets.com is an educational website on the Prophets of God: David, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and Muhammad, who established the Abrahamic faiths of Judaism, Christianity and Islam.

MuslimProphets.com explores contemporary social themes through Scripture, Evidences, Photo, Video, Maps, Current Affairs, Debate and 'alternative' Views held by Theologians, Apologists, Scholars and Street Preachers.

In accordance with Islamic etiquette, all prophet names should be followed with 'Peace Be Upon Him (PBUH)'. This is omitted to minimise text.

DISCLAIMER
The historical information provided on this website is for educational and informational purposes only.
History is an ongoing interpretation of past events. Historical accounts are shaped by the perspectives, biases, and cultural influences of their time; therefore, no content on this website should be taken as absolute, 100% factual truth. We encourage readers to approach historical narratives with a critical mind.

All website content is available in the public domain. While all information is gathered from sources believed to be reliable, its absolute accuracy cannot be guaranteed.

EXTERNAL LINKS & SEO
External links are provided as a convenience and for informational purposes only. They do not constitute an endorsement or approval of any products, services, or opinions of any organization or individual. Title and text links may be edited for external SEO, internal site structure, and keyword search purposes. We bear no responsibility for the accuracy, legality, or content found on any external website or its subsequent links.

MEDIA & SOURCE ATTRIBUTIONS
Unless otherwise indicated, all images and content are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License distributed by Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons, Pixabay, Unsplash, and similar platforms. While every effort is made to accurately source all media, contact us if you believe your copyright has been infringed so we can address and resolve the matter promptly.

All videos are hosted on and viewable via YouTube servers. Video titles are generated based on the original video title, the overall content theme (including actual dialogue and transcripts), and AI-based recommendations optimized for SEO, keyword density, and internal search functions. Video titles do not represent the views held by the YouTube video uploader, or any associated individual, organisation, or business.

All Torah, Psalms, and Old/New Testament Bible quotes are from the King James Version (KJV) Holy Bible, which is in the public domain.
All Quran quotes are from the Taqi-ud-Din al-Hilali / Muhsin Khan English Quran translation.

CORRECTIONS
If you spot a mistake, error, or omission of information, please contact us so we can review and correct it.